diff --git a/scheduler/system_sched.go b/scheduler/system_sched.go
index b2d36120b..fd6ad1d98 100644
--- a/scheduler/system_sched.go
+++ b/scheduler/system_sched.go
@@ -259,10 +259,6 @@ func (s *SystemScheduler) computePlacements(place []allocTuple) error {
 	}
 
 	nodes := make([]*structs.Node, 1)
-
-	// nodesFiltered holds the number of nodes filtered by the stack due to
-	// constrain mismatches while we are trying to place allocations on node
-	var nodesFiltered int
 	for _, missing := range place {
 		node, ok := nodeByID[missing.Alloc.NodeID]
 		if !ok {
@@ -280,7 +276,7 @@ func (s *SystemScheduler) computePlacements(place []allocTuple) error {
 			// If nodes were filtered because of constain mismatches and we
 			// couldn't create an allocation then decrementing queued for that
 			// task group
-			if s.ctx.metrics.NodesFiltered > nodesFiltered {
+			if s.ctx.metrics.NodesFiltered > 0 {
 				s.queuedAllocs[missing.TaskGroup.Name] -= 1
 
 				// If we are annotating the plan, then decrement the desired
@@ -292,9 +288,6 @@ func (s *SystemScheduler) computePlacements(place []allocTuple) error {
 				}
 			}
 
-			// Record the current number of nodes filtered in this iteration
-			nodesFiltered = s.ctx.metrics.NodesFiltered
-
 			// Check if this task group has already failed
 			if metric, ok := s.failedTGAllocs[missing.TaskGroup.Name]; ok {
 				metric.CoalescedFailures += 1
diff --git a/scheduler/system_sched_test.go b/scheduler/system_sched_test.go
index 6a34ef64b..550fbc91b 100644
--- a/scheduler/system_sched_test.go
+++ b/scheduler/system_sched_test.go
@@ -1315,3 +1315,61 @@ func TestSystemSched_PlanWithDrainedNode(t *testing.T) {
 
 	h.AssertEvalStatus(t, structs.EvalStatusComplete)
 }
+
+func TestSystemSched_QueuedAllocsMultTG(t *testing.T) {
+	h := NewHarness(t)
+
+	// Register two nodes with two different classes
+	node := mock.Node()
+	node.NodeClass = "green"
+	node.ComputeClass()
+	noErr(t, h.State.UpsertNode(h.NextIndex(), node))
+
+	node2 := mock.Node()
+	node2.NodeClass = "blue"
+	node2.ComputeClass()
+	noErr(t, h.State.UpsertNode(h.NextIndex(), node2))
+
+	// Create a Job with two task groups, each constrianed on node class
+	job := mock.SystemJob()
+	tg1 := job.TaskGroups[0]
+	tg1.Constraints = append(tg1.Constraints,
+		&structs.Constraint{
+			LTarget: "${node.class}",
+			RTarget: "green",
+			Operand: "==",
+		})
+
+	tg2 := tg1.Copy()
+	tg2.Name = "web2"
+	tg2.Constraints[0].RTarget = "blue"
+	job.TaskGroups = append(job.TaskGroups, tg2)
+	noErr(t, h.State.UpsertJob(h.NextIndex(), job))
+
+	// Create a mock evaluation to deal with drain
+	eval := &structs.Evaluation{
+		ID:          structs.GenerateUUID(),
+		Priority:    50,
+		TriggeredBy: structs.EvalTriggerNodeUpdate,
+		JobID:       job.ID,
+		NodeID:      node.ID,
+	}
+
+	// Process the evaluation
+	err := h.Process(NewSystemScheduler, eval)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	// Ensure a single plan
+	if len(h.Plans) != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", h.Plans)
+	}
+
+	qa := h.Evals[0].QueuedAllocations
+	if qa["web"] != 0 || qa["web2"] != 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("bad queued allocations %#v", qa)
+	}
+
+	h.AssertEvalStatus(t, structs.EvalStatusComplete)
+}