Some tests have containers that die almost immediately, and may die
and cleaned up before `driver.WaitUntilStarted` runs.
The causes for container dying seems special for each test:
* TestDockerDriver_Cleanup: `hello-world` image just emits a message and exits immediately
* TestDockerDriver_ForcePull_RepoDigest: the busybox image in `TestDockerDriver_ForcePull_RepoDigest` test didn't support `-p 0` argument
* TestDockerDriver_Entrypoint: with the entrypoint being `/bin/sh -c`, the command needs to be the entire string; otherwise, it ignores the comments
Currently, libcontainer-based executor, upon shutdown, kills the
container initial process. The children of the killed process remain
running, and the executor is never marked as terminated until they do.
Also, fix a case where we treat processes as successful, when
`proc.Wait()` fails. In some attempts, I was getting "waitid no child
processes" errors and such error shouldn't get process to be considered
successful.
this allows us to drop a cyclical import, but is subobptimal as it
requires BaseDriver tests to move. This falls firmly into the realm of
being a hack. Alternatives welcome.
This removes a cyclical dependency when importing client/structs from
dependencies of the plugin_loader, specifically, drivers. Due to
client/config also depending on the plugin_loader.
It also better reflects the ownership of fingerprint structs, as they
are fairly internal to the fingerprint manager.
As part of deprecating legacy drivers, we're moving the env package to a
new drivers/shared tree, as it is used by the modern docker and rkt
driver packages, and is useful for 3rd party plugins.
This allows the container to be tagged with a user friendly image name
(e.g. `redis:3.2`) rather than the image ID (e.g.
`sha256:87856cc39862cec77541d68382e4867d7ccb29a85a17221446c857ddaebca916`).
Useful for human debugging, as well as some debugging and image scanning
tools.
This risks two bad changes:
1. Discrepancy in image resolution between docker and Nomad's image
loader.
* I checked the image creation paths in Nomad, and noticed that we
either pulled the image or inspect the image with the user provided
name.
2. A race in image tagging where the tag is modified between image
loading and container creation.
* I, personally, don't think this case is cause for concern, as it is
analogous to the task running a bit later. As long as the image is
still present, creating the container should be good.
