Update the Consul/Vault build downloader functions so that we include the
current prerelease build (if any) in our E2E compatibility testing we do on each
PR. This will automatically cycle out when the GA build is released, because
that build is "higher" in the sorted set.
This reverts commit 45b36371a12ffae5b5bfaaeadb08f801fb6bc98d. Now that Vault
1.16.2 has shipped, the E2E test will pick up only a working version.
Closes: https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/20298
Vault 1.16.1 has a known issue around the JWT auth configuration that will
prevent this test from ever passing. Skip testing the JWT code path on
1.16.1. Once 1.16.2 ships it will no longer get skipped.
Ref: https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/20298
We want to run the Vault compatibility E2E test with Vault Enterprise binaries
and use Vault namespaces. Refactor the `vaultcompat` test so as to parameterize
most of the test setup logic with the namespace, and add the appropriate build
tag for the CE version of the test.
* vault: remove `token_ttl` from `vaultcompat` setup
Since Nomad uses periodic tokens, the right value to set in the role is
`token_period`, not `token_ttl`.
* vault: set 1.11.0 as min version for JWT auth
In order to use workload identities JWT auth with Vault it's required to
have a Vault cluster running v1.11.0+, which the version where
`user_claim_json_pointer` was introduced.
OIDC mandates the support of the RS256 signing algorithm so in order to maximize workload identity's usefulness this change switches from using the EdDSA signing algorithm to RS256.
Old keys will continue to use EdDSA but new keys will use RS256. The EdDSA generation code was left in place because it's fast and cheap and I'm not going to lie I hope we get to use it again.
**Test Updates**
Most of our Variables and Keyring tests had a subtle assumption in them that the keyring would be initialized by the time the test server had elected a leader. ed25519 key generation is so fast that the fact that it was happening asynchronously with server startup didn't seem to cause problems. Sadly rsa key generation is so slow that basically all of these tests failed.
I added a new `testutil.WaitForKeyring` helper to replace `testutil.WaitForLeader` in cases where the keyring must be initialized before the test may continue. However this is mostly used in the `nomad/` package.
In the `api` and `command/agent` packages I decided to switch their helpers to wait for keyring initialization by default. This will slow down tests a bit, but allow those packages to not be as concerned with subtle server readiness details. On my machine rsa key generation takes 63ms, so hopefully the difference isn't significant on CI runners.
**TODO**
- Docs and changelog entries.
- Upgrades - right now upgrades won't get RS256 keys until their root key rotates either manually or after ~30 days.
- Observability - I'm not sure there's a way for operators to see if they're using EdDSA or RS256 unless they inspect a key. The JWKS endpoint can be inspected to see if EdDSA will be used for new identities, but it doesn't technically define which key is active. If upgrades can be fixed to automatically rotate keys, we probably don't need to worry about this.
**Requiem for ed25519**
When workload identities were first implemented we did not immediately consider OIDC compliance. Consul, Vault, and many other third parties support JWT auth methods without full OIDC compliance. For the machine<-->machine use cases workload identity is intended to fulfill, OIDC seemed like a bigger risk than asset.
EdDSA/ed25519 is the signing algorithm we chose for workload identity JWTs because of all these lovely properties:
1. Deterministic keys that can be derived from our preexisting root keys. This was perhaps the biggest factor since we already had a root encryption key around from which we could derive a signing key.
2. Wonderfully compact: 64 byte private key, 32 byte public key, 64 byte signatures. Just glorious.
3. No parameters. No choices of encodings. It's all well-defined by [RFC 8032](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032).
4. Fastest performing signing algorithm! We don't even care that much about the performance of our chosen algorithm, but what a free bonus!
5. Arguably one of the most secure signing algorithms widely available. Not just from a cryptanalysis perspective, but from an API and usage perspective too.
Life was good with ed25519, but sadly it could not last.
[IDPs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_provider), such as AWS's IAM OIDC Provider, love OIDC. They have OIDC implemented for humans, so why not reuse that OIDC support for machines as well? Since OIDC mandates RS256, many implementations don't bother implementing other signing algorithms (or at least not advertising their support). A quick survey of OIDC Discovery endpoints revealed only 2 out of 10 OIDC providers advertised support for anything other than RS256:
- [PayPal](https://www.paypalobjects.com/.well-known/openid-configuration) supports HS256
- [Yahoo](https://api.login.yahoo.com/.well-known/openid-configuration) supports ES256
RS256 only:
- [GitHub](https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com/.well-known/openid-configuration)
- [GitLab](https://gitlab.com/.well-known/openid-configuration)
- [Google](https://accounts.google.com/.well-known/openid-configuration)
- [Intuit](https://developer.api.intuit.com/.well-known/openid_configuration)
- [Microsoft](https://login.microsoftonline.com/fabrikamb2c.onmicrosoft.com/v2.0/.well-known/openid-configuration)
- [SalesForce](https://login.salesforce.com/.well-known/openid-configuration)
- [SimpleLogin (acquired by ProtonMail)](https://app.simplelogin.io/.well-known/openid-configuration/)
- [TFC](https://app.terraform.io/.well-known/openid-configuration)
No functional changes, just cleaning up deprecated usages that are
removed in v2 and replace one call of .Slice with .ForEach to avoid
making the intermediate copy.
6747ef8803 fixes the Nomad client to support using the raw_exec
driver while running as a non-root user. Remove the use of sudo
in the test-e2e workflow for running integration (vaultcompat)
tests.
Although nomad officially does not support running the client as a non-root
user, doing so has been more or less possible with the raw_exec driver as
long as you don't expect features to work like networking or running tasks
as specific users. In the cgroups refactoring I bulldozed right over the
special casing we had in place for raw_exec to continue working if the cgroups
were unable to be created. This PR restores that behavior - you can now
(as before) run the nomad client as a non-root user and make use of the
raw_exec task driver.
