Point users to security doc instead. Right now it takes a lot of
explaining to describe to users exactly how to validate the binary and
what the output of the tools used means.
For example, this is the output when validating according to the
instructions in this guide and the linked doc:
```
vagrant@linux:/tmp$ gpg --verify nomad_0.8.7_SHA256SUMS.sig
nomad_0.8.7_SHA256SUMS
gpg: Signature made Fri 11 Jan 2019 09:47:56 PM UTC using RSA key ID
348FFC4C
gpg: Good signature from "HashiCorp Security <security@hashicorp.com>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 91A6 E7F8 5D05 C656 30BE F189 5185 2D87 348F
FC4C
vagrant@linux:/tmp$ shasum -a 256 -c nomad_0.8.7_SHA256SUMS
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_darwin_amd64.zip:
./nomad_0.8.7_darwin_amd64.zip: FAILED open or read
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_linux_386.zip: No such file or directory
./nomad_0.8.7_linux_386.zip: FAILED open or read
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_linux_amd64-lxc.zip: No such file or directory
./nomad_0.8.7_linux_amd64-lxc.zip: FAILED open or read
./nomad_0.8.7_linux_amd64.zip: OK
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_linux_arm64.zip: No such file or directory
./nomad_0.8.7_linux_arm64.zip: FAILED open or read
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_linux_arm.zip: No such file or directory
./nomad_0.8.7_linux_arm.zip: FAILED open or read
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_windows_386.zip: No such file or directory
./nomad_0.8.7_windows_386.zip: FAILED open or read
shasum: ./nomad_0.8.7_windows_amd64.zip: No such file or directory
./nomad_0.8.7_windows_amd64.zip: FAILED open or read
shasum: WARNING: 7 listed files could not be read
```
There are only two lines that matter in all of that output:
```
...
gpg: Good signature from "HashiCorp Security <security@hashicorp.com>"
...
./nomad_0.8.7_linux_amd64.zip: OK
...
```
I feel like trying to teach users how to use and interpret these tools
in our deployment guide may be as likely to reduce confidence as
increase it.
Reverts hashicorp/nomad#5433
Apparently, channel communications can constitute Happens-Before even for proximate variables, so this syncing isn't necessary.
> _The closing of a channel happens before a receive that returns a zero value because the channel is closed._
https://golang.org/ref/mem#tmp_7
The systemd configs spread across our repo were fairly out of sync. This
should get them on our best practices.
The deployment guide also had some strange things like running Nomad as
a non-root user. It would be fine for servers but completely breaks
clients. For simplicity I simply removed the non-root user references.
* update versions of all products and add consul-template
* update client and server user_data scripts
* modify README.md and terraform.tfvars
* fix typo in consul-template system unit file
* update AMI id
* skeleton
* configure portworx
* destroy and redeploy mysql with data intact
* rename all directories and references from persistent storage to stateful workloads
* add considerations and remove references to StorageOS
* update wording and headings
* create portworx volume externally and modify jobfile to reflect that
* fix typo
* Update website/source/guides/stateful-workloads/portworx.html.md
Co-Authored-By: Omar-Khawaja <Omar-Khawaja@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update website/source/guides/stateful-workloads/portworx.html.md
Co-Authored-By: Omar-Khawaja <Omar-Khawaja@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix#5418
When using a docker logger that doesn't support log streaming through
API, currently docker logger runs a tight loop of Docker API calls
unexpectedly. This change ensures we stop fetching logs early.
Also, this adds some basic backoff strategy when Docker API logging
fails unexpectedly, to avoid accidentally DoSing the docker daemon.
Noticed that the protobuf files are out of sync with ones generated by 1.2.0 protoc go plugin.
The cause for these files seem to be related to release processes, e.g. [0.9.0-beta1 preperation](ecec3d38de (diff-da4da188ee496377d456025c2eab4e87)), and [0.9.0-beta3 preperation](b849d84f2f).
This restores the changes to that of the pinned protoc version and fails build if protobuf files are out of sync. Sample failing Travis job is that of the first commit change: https://travis-ci.org/hashicorp/nomad/jobs/506285085
Some of the context uses in TR hooks are useless (Killed during Stop
never seems meaningful).
None of the hooks are interruptable for graceful shutdown which is
unfortunate and probably needs fixing.
