Before, we'd show a helpful error message when a task isn't running
instead of erroring in a generic way. Turns out when an alloc is
terminal but reachable, the filesystem is left behind so we were hiding
it.
Now it is always shown and in the event that something errors, it'll
either be generic, or--more commonly--a 404 of the allocation.
My suggestion is that this table isn’t sufficiently useful to
keep around with the combinatoric explosion of other lifecycle
phases. The logic was that someone might wonder “why isn’t my
main task starting?” and this table would show that the prestart
tasks hadn’t yet completed. One might wonder the same about
any task that has prerequisites, so should a poststart task have
a table that shows main tasks? And so on.
Since the route hierarchy guarantees that one has already passed
through a template that shows the lifecycle chart before one
can reach the template where this table is displayed, I believe
this table is redundant. It also conveys information in a more
abstract way than the chart, which is dense and more easily
understood, to me.
This continues #8455 by adding accessibility audits to component integration
tests and fixing associated errors. It adds audits to existing tests rather than
adding separate ones to facilitate auditing the various permutations a
component’s rendering can go through.
It also adds linting to ensure audits happen in component tests. This
necessitated consolidating test files that were scattered.
This extracts some common API-idiosyncracy-handling patterns from model serialisers into properties that are processed by the application serialiser:
* arrayNullOverrides converts a null property value to an empty array
* mapToArray converts a map to an array of maps, using the original map keys as Name properties on the array maps
* separateNanos splits nanosecond-containing timestamps into millisecond timestamps and separate nanosecond properties
This makes use of the PR I recently had merged to eslint-plugin-ember-a11y-testing
to add linting that ensures an accessibility audit is called at least once per acceptance
test file. When I have added linting for component tests, it can apply there too.
I added exclusions for the filesystem browser tests, which are covered by behaviors/fs
and for the search test which will involve significant overrides to Ember Power Select
default templates.
This introduces ember-a11y-testing to acceptance tests via a helper
wrapper that allows us to globally ignore rules that we can address
separately. It also adds fixes for the aXe rules that were failing.
